[Bug 652971] Review Request: code-editor - A text/code editor based on Qt Creator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971

--- Comment #51 from Ilyes Gouta <ilyes.gouta@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-02 06:20:25 EDT ---
Hi Michael, Kevin,

> Could be replaced with just one line for %_libdir/code-editor/

Yes, sure.

Now:

%{?filter_setup:
%filter_provides_in %_libdir/code-editor/
%filter_from_requires
/\(libAggregation\|libCPlusPlus\|libExtensionSystem\|libLanguageUtils\|libQtConcurrent\|libUtils\)\.so.*/d
%filter_from_requires
/\(libBinEditor\|libCore\|libCppEditor\|libCppTools\|libFakeVim\|libFind\|libLocator\|libTextEditor\)\.so.*/d
%filter_setup
}

and:

ilyes@whitebird ~/rpmbuild  $ rpm -qp --provides
RPMS/x86_64/code-editor-2.3.0-9.fc15.x86_64.rpm 
mimehandler(text/x-c++hdr)  
mimehandler(text/x-chdr)  
mimehandler(text/x-c++src)  
mimehandler(text/x-csrc)  
mimehandler(text/x-xsrc)  
code-editor = 2.3.0-9.fc15
code-editor(x86-64) = 2.3.0-9.fc15

ilyes@whitebird ~/rpmbuild  $ rpm -qp --requires
RPMS/x86_64/code-editor-2.3.0-9.fc15.x86_64.rpm 
hicolor-icon-theme  
xdg-utils  
qt4(x86-64) >= 4.7.4
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
libc.so.6()(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)  
libdl.so.2()(64bit)  
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)  
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)  
libm.so.6()(64bit)  
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)  
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libQtCore.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtGui.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtHelp.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtScript.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtSql.so.4()(64bit)  
libQtXml.so.4()(64bit)  
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)  
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit)  
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)  
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)  
rtld(GNU_HASH)  
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

The software is functional and:

[root@whitebird rpmbuild]# ldd /usr/bin/code-editor (trying out just the main
binary)
 linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007ffffbbff000)
 libExtensionSystem.so.1 =>
/usr/bin/../lib64/code-editor/libExtensionSystem.so.1 (0x00007f13b78e1000)
 libAggregation.so.1 => /usr/bin/../lib64/code-editor/libAggregation.so.1
(0x00007f13b76dc000)
 libQtGui.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 (0x0000003be7200000)
 libQtNetwork.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libQtNetwork.so.4 (0x0000003be8000000)
 libQtCore.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4 (0x0000003be6c00000)
 libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00000035a5800000)
 libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00000035abc00000)
 libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00000035a5c00000)
 libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00000035a6800000)
 libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000035a5400000)
 libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00000035a6000000)
 libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x00000035a7400000)
 librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00000035a6400000)
 libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00000035a7000000)
 libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libpng12.so.0 (0x00000035a9c00000)
 libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00000035a6c00000)
 libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libfreetype.so.6 (0x0000003bee200000)
 libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x00000035a7800000)
 libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libSM.so.6 (0x00000035ac800000)
 libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libICE.so.6 (0x00000035ac400000)
 libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libXi.so.6 (0x0000003e4a600000)
 libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libXrender.so.1 (0x00000035aa400000)
 libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libXrandr.so.2 (0x00000035aac00000)
 libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libXfixes.so.3 (0x00000035aa800000)
 libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libXcursor.so.1 (0x00000035ab400000)
 libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libXinerama.so.1 (0x00000035ab800000)
 libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x0000003bee600000)
 libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6 (0x00000035a9800000)
 libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6 (0x00000035a8000000)
 libssl.so.10 => /usr/lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00000033f1200000)
 libcrypto.so.10 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 (0x00000033f0e00000)
 /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000035a5000000)
 libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x00000035ac000000)
 libexpat.so.1 => /lib64/libexpat.so.1 (0x00000035a8c00000)
 libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1 (0x00000035a8400000)
 libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00000035af800000)
 libkrb5.so.3 => /lib64/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00000035b0c00000)
 libcom_err.so.2 => /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00000035aec00000)
 libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00000035b0000000)
 libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libXau.so.6 (0x00000035a8800000)
 libkrb5support.so.0 => /lib64/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x00000035afc00000)
 libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00000035b0400000)
 libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00000035a9000000)
 libselinux.so.1 => /lib64/libselinux.so.1 (0x00000035a7c00000)

We're doing good, right?

If yes, I'm going to update the SCM, build again on Koji and then push for
Bodhi updates.

Thanks,

-Ilyes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]