Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-19 17:53 EST ------- Interesting. I hope that EPSG and FSF would make some pleasant decision. Then.... Well, I almost forgot my previous review, however, * The default is "all make the option active which can be available". I forgot what option GDAL has, however, at least ------------------------------------------ --without-netcdf \ ------------------------------------------ if you _really_ want to do for some reason, please explain why because netcdf is available from Fedora Extras. Well, a spec file written by me is left on bug 205955 comment 32. (For this spec file, I don't think that we should make "-bin" subpackage). * Related to this, the use of internal copy of other libraries are forbidden on Fedora when they (the libraies) are available seperately. For example you have to submit another "libgeotiff" review request and make this package use libgeotiff package you created. * I forgot why -python subpackage is created, however, consider to make -python subpackage if it is of any sense. For packaging issue : * Well, there are several issues which must be fixed... please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review