Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732552 --- Comment #30 from Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-29 16:42:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > Apologies, this patch was meant only to illustrate the issue, not propose a > solution. It looks like bug 741137 (which created the .o file rather than the > library) was closed as 'wontfix' so I'm not sure where this is all going now. If you create a patch for bug 741137, than I’ll make sure it will get applied and sent upstream. I think it was more desperation, that solution to that bug is not complete solution as well. I believe you are on the right track, and moreover I don't think randomly scattered .o files are a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review