Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613001 --- Comment #35 from Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-28 17:10:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > I'm releasing new packages for Fedora 15 x86_64: > http://www.pingo.org/aai/heimdal/fedora15/ > > SRPMS: http://www.pingo.org/aai/heimdal/heimdal-1.5.1.pre20110912git-2.src.rpm > Specs: http://www.pingo.org/aai/heimdal/heimdal.spec This is looking good. One suggestion on handling conflicting binaries: With 1.5.1.pre20110912git-2, half the apps are renamed, and half are in /usr/lib/heimdal/bin . I'd rather we just go with ".heimdal" for everything. It will be clearer if everything follows the same convention, and it will be easier to use the man pages when everything's in the same directory. What do you think? Another thing to nail down before a formal review is the license tag. The GPL popped up on Orion's fossology run, but running git grep on master shows there are no GPL sources, so I think we can safely say "BSD and MIT". Still need to look into the bundled libraries listed above, and what would be involved to unbundle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review