Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730317 Jaromír Cápík <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jaromír Cápík <jcapik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-27 08:15:09 EDT --- I thought You would like to attach the fixed spec file ... probably misunderstanding. --- [x] Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint jboss-logmanager-log4j-1.0.0-1.fc17.src.rpm jboss-logmanager-log4j.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jboss-logmanager-log4j-1.0.0.GA.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint jboss-logmanager-log4j-1.0.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm jboss-logmanager-log4j.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint jboss-logmanager-log4j-javadoc-1.0.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm jboss-logmanager-log4j-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs -> Java docs, Java-docs, Avocados 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5]. [x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review