Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735151 Radek Novacek <rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Radek Novacek <rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-23 03:27:50 EDT --- Name: ok License: some files are GPLv3+, so license in spec should probably be GPLv3+ too. Source: ok BRs/Reqs: ok Macros used consistently: ok ldconfig: ok Desktop file validations: ok Locales: ok Docs: ok Devel: ok Files: ok Build: ok rpmlint: upstream should fix the incorrect-fsf-address in COPYING rocs.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/rocs-4.7.1/COPYING rocs.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/kde4/rocs.desktop rocs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rocs rocs-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment rocs-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment rocs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation rocs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review