Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun@xxxxxxxxx 2007-01-18 08:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > > [deji@agape reviews]$ rpmlint aqbanking-2.1.0-13.x86_64.rpm > > E: aqbanking obsolete-not-provided aqhbci > > - aqbanking needs to also 'Provides: aqhbci' > > How does this help? Anything that actually used the old aqhbci will > not work even if this did provide it - different ABI, different interface, > different paths to the binaries used. I believe this falls under the '[not] a > compatible enough replacement' category of the provides/obsoletes draft. > The way I always read Obsolete/Provides is that its meant for people installing the software, not programs using it. Thus if someone doesn't know aqhbci had been obsoleted type 'yum install aqhbci', he'll get aqbanking because of Provides. > > Uploaded as -14. Look like you inadvertently use the %doc macro under aqbanking files section again, that will clean out the directory before packaging it ;). Just listing the directory without the %doc will do. I believe the package is OK after doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review