Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative Alias: rb_libtorrent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372 ------- Additional Comments From peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-18 00:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > This file is tuned for static linking, unfortunately, in that > > it links libraries which libtorrent.so.0 is linked against > > already. > > Hmm. I was under the [apparently mistaken] impression that forcing the use of > the system zlib would offset that from the ./configure script. A patch is underway. Actually, it properly uses "-lz" in the libtorrent.pc file when built and installed in the buildroot; so such a patch is unneeded. It's just the as-shipped libtorrent.pc that contains the zlib.la usage. $ grep Libs /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc Libs: -L${libdir} -lz -lboost_date_time -lboost_filesystem -lboost_thread -lz -ltorrent $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc rb_libtorrent-devel-0.11-3.i386 For the file naming stuff, I renamed everything to include "torrent"; and have sent a message to the upstream development list with regards to this. Other stated issues are fixed in release 3. Spec: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent.spec SRPM: http://thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/rb_libtorrent-0.11-3.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review