Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735131 Radek Novacek <rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Radek Novacek <rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-21 04:16:40 EDT --- Name: ok License: source is GPLv2+, specfile says LGPLv2+ Source: ok BRs/Reqs: ok Macros used consistently: ok ldconfig: ok Desktop file validations: ok Locales: ok Docs: COPYING not installed Devel: ok Files: ok Build: ok rpmlint: no need to fix cantor.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/kde4/cantor.desktop cantor.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cantor cantor-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation cantor-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment cantor-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment cantor-libs.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libcantor_config.so libcantor_config.so cantor-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation cantor-R.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) backend -> backed, back end, back-end cantor-R.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, back end, back-end cantor-R.x86_64: W: no-documentation cantor-R.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cantor_rserver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review