[Bug 737399] Rename Review: gedit-latex - gedit plugin for editing latex documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399

--- Comment #13 from Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) <icq@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-20 04:49:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > I think the reason this is not noarch is because we need to use the libdir
> > > macro.
> > 
> > a) why?
> > b) I think %{_libdir} is available everywhere, for arch as well as for noarch.
> > Try it.
> 
> This *needs* to be arch dependent, since %{_libdir} is /usr/lib on 32-bit and
> /usr/lib64 on (multiarched) 64-bit architectures. If you install to /usr/lib on
> 64-bit, the plugin won't work.

Hey, sorry for the delay. Yeah that's what I wanted to say that it needs to be
arch dependent. 
> 
> As to the spec: the statement 
>  %dir %{_datadir}/gedit/plugins/latex
>  %{_datadir}/gedit/plugins/latex/*
> is a bit silly, since you can do the same thing with
>  %{_datadir}/gedit/plugins/latex
> or (somewhat more elaborately with)
>  %{_datadir}/gedit/plugins/latex/

Sure I'll fix this thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]