Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx 2007-01-17 18:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > While it has its drawbacks in the form of yum having to download filelists XML, > the least intrusive way I'm aware of to currently require "a browser which uses > Mozilla plugins and loads them from %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" (I'm not sure if > that's the goal here) is to use "Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins". > > See eg. bug 131247, bug 207613, and gnash, HelixPlayer, and opensc packages. Well, I have not made up my mind fully about that. Temporarily I added "Requires: firefox", as Ralf suggested, but neither his nor yours solution I see as ideal. Now I prefer the first one, assuming, that most fedora users have firefox installed and thus it will work for most people as intended. If I used "Requires: %{_libdir}/mozilla/plugins" it would solve one problem, while other would arise. If a user has not got installed a package which owns this directory, which one yum picks up? I don't suppose it'll ask you which one do you want. I think the best solution would be, as suggested in bz #131247, a standalone package which would own these directories and would be required by all packages that write to or read from these directories (e.g. firefox and totem-mozplugin). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review