Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723875 --- Comment #7 from Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-19 22:51:56 EDT --- Reason for blocking FE-Legal here was the SRPM contains a directory with various binary JARs, including an apparently GPL-licensed one, JFlex.jar, without source. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software "There may arise rare cases that an upstream project is distributing JAR files that are actually not re-distributable by Fedora. In this situation, the JAR files themselves should not be redistributed -- even in the source zip. A modified source zip should be created with some sort of modifier in the name (ex. -CLEAN) along with instructions for reproducing." This is one of those "rare cases"; obviously Fedora cannot redistribute JFlex.jar without also distributing its source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review