[Bug 717748] Review Request: UST - LTTng Userspace Tracer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748

Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-18 12:11:30 EDT ---
A first brief look:


> License:	LGPLv2

File 'COPYING' and the source file headers explicitly mention "any later
version", so:

License: LGPLv2+


> BuildRoot:	%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag


> Requires:	liburcu >= 0.6.2

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires


> %package -n libust-devel
> ...
> Requires:	liburcu-devel
> Requires:	libust = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires:	libustinstr-malloc = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires:	libustfork = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires:	libustconsumer = %{version}-%{release}
> Requires:	libustctl = %{version}-%{release}

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package


> %configure --disable-silent-rules --disable-dependency-tracking
> ...
> make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags}

Since %configure already passes on the CFLAGS (see 'rpm --eval %configure'), is
the extra CFLAGS definition when running Make necessary?


> %clean
> rm -rf %buildroot

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean


> %post -n ust
> /sbin/ldconfig
> /usr/sbin/install-info /usr/share/doc/ust.info.gz
> %preun -n ust
> /usr/sbin/install-info --delete /usr/share/doc/ust.info.gz

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Scriptlets


> %{_libdir}/libust.a

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries


> %{_datadir}/info/ust.info.gz

There also is %{_infodir} which is set by %configure, too.


> %files

Sometimes you use -n to explicitly specify the full package name (e.g. %post -n
ust), here you don't. Then you also omit the -n for the base package's %post,
%preun and %postun scriptlet sections for consistency.


> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation

Files COPYING, README and TODO could be included.


It seems the test suite currently cannot be run. If it could be run during the
build process, it would make sense to create a %check section for it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]