Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-fam - Gamin/FAM bindings for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219732 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-17 14:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > Issues: > > 1. Should there really be a devel subpackage just for docs? > If there does need to be one for some reason it should > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but I don't see a > reason to have one, unless I am missing something... The main reason why I did that is because the docs wind up being several times the size of the actual library; and they are only of interest to developers. But if you think saving space/bandwidth this way is a bad idea, I'll put them into the main package. > 2. Should the 'Requires: gamin' be needed? > rpm already puts in a requires on libfam.so.0 which is provided by > the gamin package. You are right - I removed that explicit dependency. New stuff: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/ruby-fam.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/ruby-fam-0.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review