[Bug 676124] Review Request: racket - replacement package for renamed plt-scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676124

--- Comment #7 from Eli Barzilay <eli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-15 15:21:14 EDT ---
Which libraries are you talking about?

The *sources* do have a copy of libffi libraries, since we want it to compile
on
systems that doesn't have it, but it's possible to build with the one installed
on the system instead.  (And IIRC, that's the default.)

The only other thing I can think of are two libraries that are used for plots:
there's libfit.so and libplplot.so, both from plplot.  Those are "needed"
because the guy who implemented our plot library took the sources straight from
there, and modified it to work with Racket.  This was obviously a bad idea, but
the good news is that someone else picked it up recently and reimplemented the
whole thing in plain Racket.  This means that if there's any issue with
allowing
these two libraries, it's fine to just dump them, until we get rid of that
completely.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]