Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737399 --- Comment #6 from Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-13 12:24:23 EDT --- Let me add couple of quick notes before doing a proper review: First of all, who is sergiopr and what's his role in maintaing this package? Is he still the official maintainer of nor, or what? (In reply to comment #5) > gedit-latex.x86_64: E: no-binary > that's fine No, it isn't ... if gedit-latex is noarch (which I suspect it is), it should be noarch. Actually when looking through the build gedit-latex-3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm I don't see anything arch-specific, so this package should be noarch IMHO. The only problem is that there is a bug in spec not using standard Python macros. Specifically %{python_sitelib} should be used. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for more details. > gedit-latex.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > not binary there. ditto > gedit-latex-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package > that's fine. ditto ... no debuginfo should happen, because this shouldn't be arch-specific package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review