Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731794 --- Comment #9 from Tomas Miljenović (TomasM) <TomasMiljenovic@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-09 01:49:09 EDT --- After discussing this with Jaroslav Řezník on #fedora-kde a while back I'd thought this was the way to go, but now I'm not so confident that I correctly remember his recommendations. However, I am sure that: - QtQuick3D needs qmake and Qt sources to build, but does not need to be built with the rest of Qt4 - Qt4 X11 libs (and other libs) should not need to link against QtQuick3D* libs - Qt4 X11 libs (and other libs) don't need to link against Qt3D* libs (not sure if they should for current Fedora policy) I'd previously attached a qt-quick3d.spec for packaging this separately; I've just updated it, and a source RPM (missing earlier) can be found at: http://tomasm.tk/fedorarepo/TMM/SRPMS/qt-quick3d-0-tp1.4.TMM.fc15.src.rpm I've trialled this with some of the bundled Qt3D and QML demos, and a few declarative plasmoids importing Qt3D* bits. When I first filed the review request, I was still hopeful QtQuick3D would eventually make it into a 4.8 release (and now, I'm not sure if you'd really want to build this as part of Qt 4.x ever). The only downsides to a separate build that I'm aware of are having a second SRPM carrying the 224M qt open source tarball, and a potential need to rebase some defines or take patches from the qt4 spec file in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review