Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722204 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-08 10:57:32 EDT --- Rex, sorry for delay, here we go. Name: ok Summary: ok License: there are also LGPLv2+ bits, according the policy we want to list all licenses explicitely, it should be there URL: ok Source: ok (md5sum c29b4712b1992ce2ea7834b7cfe1fff8) BRs/Reqs: ok Obsoletes: ok Description: ok (for subpackages too) Build section: ok Desktop file validation: ok Icon cache: ok Ldconfig for -libs subpackages: ok Macros used consistently: ok Docs: ok Builds: ok, available in unofficial repos already rpmlint calligra-2.3.74-1.fc15.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Calligra package is a direct successor of koffice package and is well maintained, thus in a good shape. Please, fix license field, I'll approve it then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review