Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IceWM - Lightweight Window Manager. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222521 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad@xxxxxxxxx 2007-01-16 10:57 EST ------- - Tab size: I'm using ts=4 - which may cause a problem if/when ts=8. (I know that there's a world war going on about tab size/stop). Is there a unified SPEC format that dictates the tab size and/or tabs vs. spaces? - CXXFLAGS: AFAICS these are the CXXFLAGS generated by automake. - Themes: Due to bandwidth constraints, I don't use mock. At least on my dev machine, themes are packed into the RPM. - KDE: Fedora is GNOME centric. While I'm a KDE user myself, I see little reason to force users to install the KDE dep-chain when they are looking for a lightweight WM. In short, KDE is removed from menu.in. - Default menu: * Browser: AFAIK Firefox is the default browser in Fedora. Added as the default browser in the main menu. (htmlview is less useful) Should we consider elinks instead? * Misc: I'm also getting idesk and gmrun reviewed - once they are in, I'll add them as BR/R in an attempt to create a fuller DE environment. * Tue Jan 16 2007 <gilboad AT gmail DOT com> - 1.2.30-4 - Fix man page name. - Remove missing menu items. - Convert GNOME-menu patch to configure.in patch. - Push default configuration into /etc/icewm - Remove default KDE support. (GNOME centric distribution - no need to drag the KDE dep-chain in a lightweight WM) - Require firefox (default browser in Fedora). - Add missing firefox icon. (No source - manual convert) - Add missing gnome-menus. (required for GNOME2 menus) - Fix missing gettext BR. - Fix missing lang support. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/icewm-1.2.30-4.src.rpm - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review