Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aqbanking - A library for online banking functions and financial data import/export https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222522 ------- Additional Comments From notting@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-15 22:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it > does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require > a package which does create that directory. The exception to this > are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy > Standard ([WWW] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), > as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. Messy; essentially means any automake-ed devel package will require automake even if no one uses it. Ah well. Fixed. > > versioned Obsoletes > > ... make it less of a hassle in case you (or your fellow packagers) > ever want to bring back packages with the obsolete names (and that > has been a real-world scenario before, not a purely theoretical one). Oh, I know the theory and that it happens; just not sure it will happen in this case. (Of course, if it happens with a new package, in the same namespace, with a lower version, then you get to play with epochs. Yay!) Tweaked for the last version I could find anywhere (1.0.3). New stuff uploaded as -12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review