Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isomaster - an easy to use GUI CD image editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220969 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak@xxxxx 2007-01-15 17:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > APPROVED > > You seem to have no other package submitted, I created packages for a few applications (see my webpage: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms.html) which I recognized as useful and which hadn't had RPMs already. Some of them (like p7zip) were already added to FE by other people (based on my SPEC files). I made a proposal with isomaster to gain experience with passing FE requirements and I plan to add some other packages too. I've already submited review request of fuse-smb (bug 222742). > but I can sponsor you nevertheless. You would continue at this step: Thanks Michael. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors#head-a89c07b5b8abe7748b6b39f0f89768d595234907 It doesn't look to be user friendly :) > Packaging subtleties: > > * .desktop category "Application" is deprecated, might be rejected > by a newer desktop-file-install and desktop-file-validate > > * %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1.gz => %{_mandir}/man1/isomaster.1* > would make the spec not fail if automatic compression of manual > pages is disabled or changed One question. Should I: - respect those suggestions in the "final" version uploaded to CVS, - wait with fixes until next "big" sotware version, - fix those things and ask once again for aproval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review