Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457343 Stijn Hoop <stijn@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stijn@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #11 from Stijn Hoop <stijn@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-31 08:44:10 EDT --- While this is surely a more general problem, I just happened upon this and this: > but I guess you need to then include "js/sizzle.js" before including > "js/jquery.js" in your application. Would that be an acceptable requirement > for packagers? most certainly is not going to fly in the real world. Are you really suggesting that every webapp needs to be patched by packagers to do this? Because upstreams will certainly refuse such a patch anyway... If this package makes it through and it *requires* modifications to packaged webapps to make use of it, I would not be surprised if the number of packaged webapps simply drops (but hey, please prove me wrong). IMHO, comparing a javascript "library" to a .so is simply wrong to begin with, and bundling here should be allowed. The only thing to make sure is that security issues can be identified ASAP; which involves making it easy to identify every .srpm that bundles a specific jquery version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review