Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730043 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-28 23:16:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Just an old FSF address, no further issues. You might drop the LICENSE from > files, because the package is licensed under the common Perl terms anyway. Already reported upstream. https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=70227 I can't simply drop it - licensing guidelines require that "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc" Thanks, as ever, for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review