Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719103 Volker Fröhlich <volker27@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |volker27@xxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Volker Fröhlich <volker27@xxxxxx> 2011-08-23 12:13:59 EDT --- rpmlint mex-0.1.4-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm mex.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) centre -> center, cent re, cent-re mex.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US centre -> center, cent re, cent-re mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/40mex-recommended.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/100mex-debug.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/20mex-gnome-dvb.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/40mex-queue.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/00mex-search.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/20mex-tracker.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/20mex-upnp.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mex-webremote ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mex ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/mex/plugins/50mex-dbusinput.so ['/usr/lib64'] mex.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mex-0.1.4/COPYING mex.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libmex-0.2.so.0.0.0 mex.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libmex-0.2.so mex.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mex-webremote mex.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mex-debug mex.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mex Get rid of the rpaths. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Removing_Rpath Please contact the developer, so he can update the license file with the one up to date. You may opt to correct the address in the package. Libs in standard directories need an ldconfig run. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Shared_Libraries You'll need a devel sub-package: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages Installing files to /usr/share/icons, you need this scriptlet: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Use the name macro instead of "mex". Try to break the %configure line. You can drop the defattr line. It's not necessary. If you don't plan to go for EPEL5 or older, drop the clean section and the rm in the install section. If you want to go for EPEL5, define the buildroot. Be more specific in your file section. For instance: all binaries start with %{name}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review