Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675557 --- Comment #24 from Pavel Zhukov <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-23 01:38:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > So far I've found two blocking problems in 0.1.1-5: > > · GNAT_optflags is not in effect during the build, only in the check phase. I > recommend overriding GPRBUILD_FLAGS on the Make command line. fixed. Added fedora-gnat-project >= 3 to BR > · config.gpr is architecture-specific. It needs to be patched to make use of > Directories.Libdir. Something also needs to be done about the variable > Architecture. It looks like its default value varies between architectures, > which will cause a multilib conflict. I think a case statement could be used to > derive Architecture from Directories.Hardware_Platform. Fixed > I also wonder why you're claiming that RPMbuild can't create debuginfo > packages, because I get debuginfo packages built for my Ada packages, and they > work as they should in GDB as far as I can see. I tried removing "%define > debug_package %{nil}" from matreshka.spec, and I got a debuginfo package that > seems to contain the files it should contain. What problem do you have with > debuginfo packages? Fixed. I had problem with debuginfo and rpmlint warnings in zeromq-ada package. It's Copy-Paste error :) http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/matreshka/matreshka-0.1.1-6.fc16.src.rpm http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/matreshka/matreshka.spec Koji OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review