Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199 --- Comment #11 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-14 08:16:17 EDT --- Thanks for taking a look at this. I've researched the matter further and discovered that we should track the openSUSE stable branches of all the ZYpp tools instead of the latest releases. This way they'll pass the tests and generally be less buggy. I've also now included the language bindings for this package. I was originally under the impression that they should be packaged seperately, but they're included with the upstream tarball and other Fedora packages also ship them in one SRPM when that is the case. Spec: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver.spec SRPM: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.src.rpm $ rpmlint SPECS/satsolver.spec SPECS/satsolver.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: satsolver-0.16.3.tar.bz2 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libzypp -> Libby satsolver.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libzypp -> Libby satsolver.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US satisfiability -> insatiability, advisability satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repo2solv.sh satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repomdxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mergesolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dumpsolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmdb2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deltainfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary susetags2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmmd2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpms2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary updateinfoxml2solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. $ rpmlint satsolver-devel-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libzypp -> Libby satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libzypp -> Libby satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US satisfiability -> insatiability, advisability satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary helix2solv satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deptestomatic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. $ rpmlint python-satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm # not filtered because this package contains binaries in $PATH python-satsolver.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_satsolver.so _satsolver.so()(64bit) python-satsolver.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint ruby-satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint perl-satsolver-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm # not filtered because this package contains binaries in $PATH perl-satsolver.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/satsolver.so satsolver.so()(64bit) perl-satsolver.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/satsolver.so satsolver.so()(64bit) perl-satsolver.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint satsolver-demo-0.16.3-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review