Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ConsoleKit - System daemon for tracking seats and sessions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222404 ------- Additional Comments From jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-12 11:34 EST ------- rpmlint has some interesting things to say: W: ConsoleKit conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit Are these really config files? W: ConsoleKit non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/console-kit.conf This WOULD be a config, and should get (noreplace) maybe? E: ConsoleKit executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit Another dupe of above. W: ConsoleKit service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit I think this is fine yes? We _always_ want ConsoleKit running? W: ConsoleKit incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit $servicename W: ConsoleKit incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit $servicename W: ConsoleKit incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit $servicename This is because "ConsoleKit" != the binary name. I think thats OK in this case right? W: ConsoleKit no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ConsoleKit Does 'reload' vs restart make any sense in this daemon? W: ConsoleKit incoherent-init-script-name ConsoleKit Dupe from above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review