Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729199 --- Comment #3 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingsworth@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-09 08:52:54 EDT --- Oops, wrong tab. Sorry for the noise, folks. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-0.17.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repo2solv.sh satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary repomdxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mergesolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dumpsolv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary installcheck satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deltainfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmdb2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary updateinfoxml2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpmmd2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rpms2solv satsolver.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary susetags2solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-devel-0.17.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary helix2solv satsolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deptestomatic 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/satsolver-demo-0.17.2-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-documentation satsolver-demo.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary solv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review