Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728737 --- Comment #2 from Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-07 03:13:15 EDT --- Hi Orcan, The base package requirement in the subpackages needs to be in the format "%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}" (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package). Not a blocker but noted use of old FSF address. Most source headers are OK. bsjones@f15laptop ~$rpmlint /home/rawhide/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libinstpatch*.rpm libinstpatch.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wavetable -> wave table, wave-table, vegetable libinstpatch.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libinstpatch-1.0.0-svn386.tar.bz2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. bsjones@f15laptop ~$rpmlint /home/rawhide/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libinstpatch*.rpm libinstpatch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wavetable -> wave table, wave-table, vegetable libinstpatch-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/libinstpatch-1.0/libinstpatch/version.h libinstpatch-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/libinstpatch-1.0/libinstpatch/libinstpatch.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review