[Bug 222220] Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: polyester - KDE style and window decoration


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222220





------- Additional Comments From josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-01-11 14:51 EST -------
==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
* rpmlint output
[josef@dhcp59-136 SPECS]$ 
rpmlint /home/josef/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/polyester-1.0-1.x86_64.rpm
E: polyester 
binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/kstyle_polyester_config.so 
['/usr/lib64']
E: polyester 
binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/kwin_polyester_config.so 
['/usr/lib64']
E: polyester binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/kwin3_polyester.so 
['/usr/lib64']
E: polyester 
binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/kde3/plugins/styles/polyester.so 
['/usr/lib64']

- package meets package naming guidelines
- spec filename matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license file included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream
12e5f0fa6daeb083621635b410d7c813  polyester-1.0.tar.bz2
- package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC6
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- locales handled properly
- uses ldconfig properly
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- directories it does not create owned by default packages
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean section
- macro usage consistent
- package contains code
- no large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library files with suffix
- no need for devel subpackage
* contains .la files (should be OK 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives)
* desktop file is not installed via the appropriate methods
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages

====Things that need to be addressed====
* You need to fix the rpmlint errors.
* You do not need the "Requires: kdebase", that should be pulled in 
automatically
* You need to install the desktop file appropriatly, look here for an example
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755
  gxine seems to install it by itself, so you will want to do something like 
what I did for geany
	http://www.toxicpanda.com/geany.spec

I'm not sponsored, this is just a review to help me get sponsored.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]