[Bug 714327] Review Request: libtpcimgio - Turku PET Centre for image file input and output procedures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714327

--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-05 10:26:12 EDT ---
+: OK
-: must be fixed
=: should be fixed (at your discretion)
?: Question or clairification needed
N: not applicable

MUST:
[+] rpmlint output: shown in comment: No unexpected output
[+] follows package naming guidelines
[+] spec file base name matches package name
[+] package meets the packaging guidelines
[+] package uses a Fedora approved license: LGPLv2+
[+] license field matches the actual license.
[N] license file is included in %doc:
[+] spec file is in American English
[+] spec file is legible
[+] sources match upstream: md5sums match: ced548015aae0c1f50827b6d51aade9c
[+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested F14/F15
[N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch
[+] all build requirements in BuildRequires
[N] spec file handles locales properly
[N] ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] no bundled copies of system libraries
[N] no relocatable packages
[N] package owns all directories that it creates
[+] no files listed twice in %files
[+] proper permissions on files
[+] consistent use of macros
[+] code or permissible content
[N] large documentation in -doc
[+] no runtime dependencies in %doc
[+] header files in -devel
[+] static libraries in -static: In -devel with -static Provides
[+] .so in -devel
[+] -devel requires main package
[+] package contains no libtool archives
[N] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate
[+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages
[+] all filenames in UTF-8

SHOULD:
[N] query upstream for license text
[N] description and summary contains available translations
[+] package builds in mock
[+] package builds on all supported arches
[?] package functions as described: Did not test.
[+] sane scriptlets
[N] subpackages require the main package (other than -devel)
[N] placement of pkgconfig files
[N] file dependencies versus package dependencies
[=] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts:

*** APPROVED ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]