Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 --- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-04 09:00:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Name: ? shouldn't we name it according ruby package naming scheme ruby-qt [1] > it's not in packaging guideline, i think it's better to follow the upstream > name scheme For Ruby packages you should follow Ruby packaging guidelines [1]. Of course they specify also the mentioned "ruby-" prefix [2] which is clearly the case for QT binding. > > Summary: ok just s/QT4/Qt 4 > > License: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ > > Group: ok > > URL: ok > > Sources: ok (md5sum d17198b985f954cedd92ab669623de59) > > BuildRoot: ok > > Requires/BuildRequires: not ok according to Ruby packaging guideline (no ABI > > specified) etc. > fixed Here [3] is the guideline. > > Provides/Obsoletes: not ok, non sense to obsolete/provide same package (as it > > was in kdebindings subpackage already) > we need it for upgrade process. > > > Description: ok > > Devel package: ok (but same prov/obs) > > Macros usage: ok, consistent > > ldconfig: ok > > Other Ruby requirements: ok > > Docs: ok > > > > > qtruby.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ > fixed > > > qtruby.src: E: specfile-error sh: ruby: command not found > > qtruby.src: E: specfile-error sh: ruby: command not found > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. > > it's rpmlint bug You probably don't have ruby installed on your machine. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Naming_Guidelines [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review