Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 --- Comment #28 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-04 05:57:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > I guess that doesn't matter, there doesn't seem to be a clear guideline, but > I've been following %{ruby_sitearch}/%{gemname}/*.so The *.so file has to follow the original gem folder structure. E.g: 1) %{geminstdir}/lib/foo.so => %{ruby_sitearch}/foo.so 2) %{geminstdir}/lib/%{gemname}/foo.so => %{ruby_sitearch}/%{gemname}/foo.so 2) %{geminstdir}/ext/foo.so => %{ruby_sitearch}/ext/foo.so If you do not follow this rule, then you would need to patch the require of *.so file somewhere in gem ruby code, because the *.so file wouldn't be possible to find using Ruby $LOAD_PATH. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review