Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727780 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-08-04 05:42:36 EDT --- Name: ? shouldn't we name it according ruby package naming scheme ruby-qt [1] Summary: ok just s/QT4/Qt 4 License: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ Group: ok URL: ok Sources: ok (md5sum d17198b985f954cedd92ab669623de59) BuildRoot: ok Requires/BuildRequires: not ok according to Ruby packaging guideline (no ABI specified) etc. Provides/Obsoletes: not ok, non sense to obsolete/provide same package (as it was in kdebindings subpackage already) Description: ok Devel package: ok (but same prov/obs) Macros usage: ok, consistent ldconfig: ok Other Ruby requirements: ok Docs: ok rpmlint qtruby-4.7.0-1.src.rpm qtruby.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ qtruby.src: E: specfile-error sh: ruby: command not found qtruby.src: E: specfile-error sh: ruby: command not found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review