Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 --- Comment #166 from Juha Tuomala <tuju@xxxxxx> 2011-08-03 08:11:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #156) > There's probably not going to be official packages of Asterisk for EPEL because > my Asterisk packages require speex 1.2 and RHEL/CentOS has speex 1.0.5. # rpm -q speex centos-release speex-1.2-0.12.rc1.1.el6.x86_64 centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64 I can co-maintain if we decide to compile for epel5. --- Comment #167 from Juha Tuomala <tuju@xxxxxx> 2011-08-03 08:11:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #156) > There's probably not going to be official packages of Asterisk for EPEL because > my Asterisk packages require speex 1.2 and RHEL/CentOS has speex 1.0.5. # rpm -q speex centos-release speex-1.2-0.12.rc1.1.el6.x86_64 centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64 I can co-maintain if we decide to compile for epel6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review