Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pastebin - A collaborative debugging tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222257 dennis@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |dennis@xxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dennis@xxxxxxxx 2007-01-11 01:21 EST ------- package meets naming and packaging guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. GPL License text included in package. source files match upstream: d7b8993f4baed7753fb7c912b06725fb pastebin.tar.gz d7b8993f4baed7753fb7c912b06725fb ../SOURCES/pastebin.tar.gz latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock ( FC-6 ). rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane no shared libraries are present. package is not relocatable. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. file permissions are appropriate. %clean is present. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. Needs fixing does not own %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} listed twice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review