Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 --- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-30 08:01:58 EDT --- Sorry for the late response. Thanks for processing the feedback and updating the package. Just one little nitpick, you forgot to add a new %changelog entry at http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=mingw32-cxxtest.git;a=commitdiff;h=10cd67fbff548076f5521cdba69afdd53aa4fef9 Regarding your question about a mass-rename. At the moment we can't give you a real answer to that question. Once the mingw-w64 toolchain is in Fedora (which is expected in the F-17 release cycle) all current mingw32-* packages have to be renamed to mingw-* and updated to be compliant with the new mingw packaging guidelines in order to add mingw-w64 support. As there are already about 100 different mingw32-* packages in Fedora it doesn't seem practical to start the package rename process (which includes a full review) for all these packages. So we're currently thinking about asking FeSCO for an exception for a mass rename, but we'll have to wait for the mingw-w64 toolchain to enter Fedora first before moving on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review