Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-10 11:43 EST ------- Well, let's start again. Well, for 3.2-7: * Conditional dependencies: - Mockbuild log (on FC-devel i386) says: ---------------------------------------- checking security/pam_appl.h usability... no checking security/pam_appl.h presence... no ---------------------------------------- These are included in pam-devel. ******************************************************************* * * WARNING: One or more items required for the xmldump plugin are * missing: * * libxml2.so or libxml2.a...yes * gdome.h...yes * libgdome.so or libgdome.a...yes * glib.h...yes * libglib.so or libglib.a...no * glibconfig.h...yes * * (yes means it was found, no means it was not found) * * ntop will run just fine without this plugin. * *>>> If you want to use the xmldump plugin, * *??? 1. Install the necessary headers and libraries. *??? and rerun ./configure * ******************************************************************* libglib.so is included in glib-devel. * BuildRequires: -------------------------------------------------------- redundant package <= package which requires it tcp_wrappers net-snmp-devel autoconf automake automake libtool (However, I don't mind if you want to write "automake" explicitly) pkgconfig glib2-devel glib2-devel gdome2-devel -------------------------------------------------------- * Encoding: --------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/doc/ntop-3.2/ChangeLog: ISO-8859 English text --------------------------------------------------------- - Please change the encoding to UTF-8. * For SEGV issue Patrice saw: Oh, I got SEGV, too! However, not completely reproducible, however, for me this happens at the same point at last. One example: ---------------------------------------------------------- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread -1273857136 (LWP 20547)] 0x00f58402 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt #0 0x00f58402 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x00bd8c70 in *__GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 #2 0x00bda4c1 in *__GI_abort () at abort.c:88 #3 0x00c0e29b in __libc_message (do_abort=2, fmt=0xcd21c4 "*** glibc detected *** %s: %s: 0x%s ***\n") at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/libc_fatal.c:170 #4 0x00c15e29 in _int_free (av=0xcfc120, mem=0x82e67a0) at malloc.c:5774 #5 0x00c19650 in *__GI___libc_free (mem=0x82e67a0) at malloc.c:3552 #6 0x00f726cc in ntop_safefree (ptr=0x81d6154, file=0xfaa9fc "util.c", line=2601) at leaks.c:188 #7 0x00f964b9 in traceEvent (eventTraceLevel=3, file=0xfa73fd "ntop.c", line=136, format=0xfa7d40 "THREADMGMT[t%lu]: NPS(%d,%s): pcapDispatch thread terminated [p%d]") at util.c:2601 #8 0x00f75a62 in pcapDispatch (_i=0x0) at ntop.c:136 #9 0x00d382db in start_thread (arg=0xb4127b90) at pthread_create.c:296 #10 0x00c7d24e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 ---------------------------------------------------------- And.. in util.c: ---------------------------------------------------------- 2598 } 2599 2600 if (myGlobals.logView[myGlobals.logViewNext] != NULL) 2601 free(myGlobals.logView[myGlobals.logViewNext]); <- PROBLEM HAPPENED HERE!! 2602 2603 myGlobals.logView[myGlobals.logViewNext] = strdup(buf); 2604 2605 myGlobals.logViewNext = (myGlobals.logViewNext + 1) % CONST_LOG_VIEW_BUFFER_SIZE; 2606 2607 if(myGlobals.logViewMutex.isInitialized) { ---------------------------------------------------------- It seems that myGlobals.logView is not initialized correctly by NULL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review