[Bug 705363] Review Request: spacewalk-web - Spacewalk Web site packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705363

--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-29 03:52:09 EDT ---
> TODO: spacewalk-html subpackage contains MIT licensed code
> (html/javascript/controls.js,
> http://madrobby.github.com/scriptaculous/license/). Add proper value to License
> tag for this subpackage.

Actually the javascript code is in separate files. The MIT code does not
combine with GPL code until it reaches client web browser, so the MIT code is
not infected by GPL code in source nor binary RPM package. Thus I conclude
adding `MIT' to package license tag is a must. Thus:

FIX: Add MIT to license tag of spacewalk-html sub-package.


And yet another problem. The Perl modules are installed into global Perl vendor
directory, thus they are accessible by any other Perl programs. Also your Perl
modules contain tests and other Perl infrastructure that is not utilized by
your spec file. In other words the Perl modules seem to be bundled to
spacewalk-web source tar ball and thus should be packaged as standalone RPM
packages (with running tests) by standalone SPEC files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]