Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomescan - Gnome Scanner Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222043 ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-01-10 00:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I am not an official reviewer, so consider this a pre-review. > > Thanks for looking at it. > > > > > What I am unsure about is this. It seems to me that this includes both gnomescan > > (flegita - the actual scanning application) and libgnomescan. Should the two be > > packaged separately? I don' think we need both packaged separately. > > > I believe it's okay as is, seems like flegita is sort of a codename or nickname, > and people who want to use the libs part can make use of the -devel subpackage. > However, I found that you don't need pkgconfig as BR for main package. Also, do we really need libtool as BR and all other make LIBTOOL? I removed them and did mock test and it went fine. Can you check that with testing application?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review