Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725905 --- Comment #3 from Stef Walter <stefw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-27 03:28:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Stef, by what name are applications supposed to look up the library if they > want to use it as a PKCS11 proxy module? Should we be installing the > libp11-kit.so symlink in the main package so that applications could dlopen() > it using that name? That sounds like a good plan. I look at putting this into p11-kit upstream. > Also, are you aware that using Apache License 2.0 code makes the whole library > incompatible with GPLv2-only code? Hmmm, that's true. I'll rewrite the bits that came from apr, and then we can get rid of this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review