Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724878 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2011-07-26 05:51:54 EDT --- Hi Johannes, (In reply to comment #3) > With the library of qcodeedit don't really know how to proceed. I see two > possible solutions: > > 1. Ask FPC for an exception for qcodeedit Yes, that's the way to go. You should explain in the FPC ticket what (incompatible) changes have been made to qcodeedit and why it's not possible to integrate them in the regular release. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Exceptions > 2. patch qcodeedit with the changes made by the texstudio-devs (don't know if > that's possible though) You should not modify the functionality and/or the API of the original library because this will cause problems to potential future packages that depend on the original sources. Alternatively, the developers of TeXstudio could think of a fork and release their modified qcodeedit separately. But as stated in the forum post, that obviously isn't an option. > I'm quite sorry for the probably useless review of qcodeedit. Not a problem at all. The package might nonetheless be useful to Fedora users/developers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review