Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #55 from Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-23 13:59:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Hi Tim, > > The version number suffixes allow multiple versions of openrave to be installed > at the same (0.4.1 was still experimental, but the newest 0.4.2 does a much > better job of this). We will eventually have symlinks installed through > update-alternatives that change the openrave version used. This is a no-go. There is one version installed via the package manager, that's it. I only kept it in the include dir because there is another openrave dir inside it. And you still can have multiple versions, as the SOVERSION is attached to the file name. Keeping up2date with OpenRAVE is hard enough, having more than one version would make things pretty bad. > We worked very hard to make this possible, so it would be great if the fedora > package is consistent with the ubuntu packages. Users shouldn't have to deal > with fedora-only quirks. Nope, that's a Debian/Ubuntu thing, but cannot happen on Fedora besides very specific exceptions (core libraries like glib/gtk for example). > We still have to integrate the new fparser into OpenRAVE. We're about to > release 0.4.2, so it'll be a great timing to have a cmake-package for fparser > for it. Great! > Please send the boost fixes asap so we can integrate them in 0.4.2. > > Are you talking about the recent release of collada-dom 2.3? It's 2.3.1, I needed it to have the cmake files. Update is pending, cf. Bodhi and Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review