[Bug 221184] Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libundo - Undo/redo information managing library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221184





------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-01-09 11:54 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, I could reply with a quote: “we don't create evil, we only package it”.  
... and it's task of a review not to let pass through all kind of junk ;)

> I could add extern C guards if someone could tell me how to do so.

You should find this in all C-books having been released since 1989:

#ifdef  __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif
....
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif

> As for
> installation dir, I think that putting a single header into its own subdir is a
> bit of an overkill.
The number of headers doesn't matter. One single header is as evil as is a
dozen. /usr/include is in the compiler's default header search path, so any
poorly designed package installing a header inside is likely to conflict with
other headers.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]