Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bcfg2 - Configuration management client and server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220284 ------- Additional Comments From jeff@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-09 09:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Is there still any open issue with the package? I think the only question still remaining is the license. http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/bcfg2/browser/trunk/bcfg2/COPYRIGHT I think that it's free enough to be included in Fedora, but I'm not sure that it's exactly the BSD licese. > I think there was just the upstream request to package in accord to their > subpackaging structure, which is up to you, both ways are fine. You can change > the subpackaging also later, if you haven't made your mind 100% yet. I'd like to > get this in, so it can be coevaluated with the other solutions. Thanks! Yeah, it doesn't matter to me much either way so I'll go along with upstream. Spec URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.3-2.fc6.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.ocjtech.us/misc/fedora/6/SRPMS/bcfg2-0.8.7.3-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review