Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722914 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2011-07-21 10:23:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > - As a courtesy to people reading your spec files, please don't use macros in > > the URL if they're not absolutely necessary. > > Why not? we have spectool... Copy'n'paste doesn't work that well with macros. Spectool is great for getting the sources, but it doesn't give project URLs. As far as I see it, the alternative is getting the sources, building the RPM and running $ rpm -qpi package.rpm to see the expanded URL... Anyway, even if the project name were ridiculously long, I doubt that you'd spend many characters spelling it out explicitly, compared to using the %{name} macro. It's a huge help, e.g. when you browse the review queue or look at spec files at pkgs.fedoraproject.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review