[Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219930





------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-01-08 15:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)

> OK - rpmlint -i lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm 
> W: lxpanel non-coherent-filename lxpanel-0.2.4-3.src.rpm
> The file which contains the package should be named
> <NAME>-<VERSION>-<RELEASE>.<ARCH>.rpm.

Mhh. Strange. I can't remember which .rpmmacros I have used for this package. 
So I've uploaded a new version which is the result of the mock build. Could you 
test it for this issue (just to play safe this time)?

> First part is a BSD like license, second GPLv2.
> OK - Since GPL is more restrictive than BSD the whole package becomes GPL. So
> the license field in the spec is ok.

The GPL is also the license at gnomefiles.org:
http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php/LXPanel


> MINOR NOTE - line warps in long fields like %description are usually done 
after
> 79 characters.

Fixed.

> MINOR NOTE - Instead of 
> %dir %{_datadir}/lxpanel/
>         %{_datadir}/lxpanel/*
>         %dir %{_libdir}/lxpanel/
>         %{_libdir}/lxpanel/*
>         you could simply use
> %{_datadir}/lxpanel/
>         %{_libdir}/lxpanel/

Ok. Fixed.

> OK - IMO no desktop file is needed since it's panel and not what I call a
> typical program/standalone application. 

Also think so. gnome-panel and kicker also have no desktop file.

> OK - lxpanel works fine, but lxpanelctl is buggy. I can't add more starter
> because the "Select Application"-Dialog doesn't list the files in
> /usr/share/applications. Also hitting return in the location bar doesn't 
work.
> Looking at src/plugins/launchbar.c I think this is a known issue (see the 
FIXME
> in line 490) and isn't really meant to work atm.

You're right. Seems to be already filed as a bug:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1623222&group_id=180858&atid=894869


SPEC Url: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel.spec
SRPM Url: 
http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/lxpanel/lxpanel-0.2.4-4.fc6.src.rpm

Changelog:
* Mon Jan 08 2007 Sebastian Vahl <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.2.4-4
- Fixed some minor issues from the review process (#219930)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]