Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705043 --- Comment #14 from Veeti Paananen <veeti.paananen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-18 13:14:48 EDT --- New spec and SRPM: SPEC: http://rojekti.fi/files/paco/5/paco.spec SRPM: http://rojekti.fi/files/paco/5/paco-2.0.9-5.fc15.src.rpm Changelog: * Mon Jul 18 2011 Veeti Paananen <veeti.paananen@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.0.9-5 - Replaced build root variables with the build root macro - Renamed GUI subpackage to gpaco after the upstream name - Changed license to GPLv2+ - Removed empty line in gpaco description rpmlint: [veeti@veeti-pc SRPMS]$ rpmlint paco-2.0.9-5.fc15.src.rpm paco.src:22: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [veeti@veeti-pc x86_64]$ rpmlint paco-2.0.9-5.fc15.x86_64.rpm gpaco-2.0.9-5.fc15.x86_64.rpm paco.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpaco-log.so.0.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 paco.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ocap gpaco.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) paco -> capo, pace, pact gpaco.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US paco -> capo, pace, pact gpaco.x86_64: W: no-documentation gpaco.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gpaco 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. ---------- I'll check the package wishlist for anything that I would be interested in and look for packages I can comment on. Right now I've left comments on these: bug 713923, bug 714491, bug 714543, bug 714899, bug 716580, bug 717337 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review