Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geany - a lightweight gtk2 based IDE Alias: geany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220922 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2007-01-08 13:38 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output W: geany devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/geany/filetypes.c Okay, see comment #7 - package meets package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - package licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 2ffaae9b0fa807bdd4be0e6ec0f4a2e5 geany-0.10.tar.bz2 - package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 FC6 - all build dependencies listed in BR - locales handled properly - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create owned by default packages - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files with suffix - no need for devel subpackage - no .la files - contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages *** APPROVED *** Since you are not yet sponsered, I want to see a couple package reviews from you before blocking FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review