[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707

--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-07-17 04:16:50 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The LICENSE file is named COPYING in this package. This is OK. The other
> documents included in the package really don't have any specific use for a
> Fedora install and don't really need to be included in the package. (Packagers
> discretion.)

The MinGW packages are somewhat special, because they are essentially just
copies of the native packages, built for a different target. Because of that,
we try to avoid packaging up documentation files that would otherwise just
duplicate what's in the corresponding native packages. See e.g. the section on
man and info files:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Manpages_and_info_files


> The F14 build failure issue could be addressed. The error occurs becuase F14
> curently has mingw32-filesystem Ver. 64 F15 has Ver. 68, does this package
> specifically require Ver. 68 of mingw32-filesystem? If not this problem can be
> solved by de-versioning the BuildRequires for mingw32-filesystem >= 68

Yeah, mingw32-filesystem >= 68 is actually needed for generating correct
Provides and Requires for this package.


Thanks for the reviews, everybody!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]